Hartsburg-Emden Community Unit School District 21
Hartsburg-Emden Community Unit School District 21 is located close to the center of Illinois. Hartsburg-Emden Community Unit School District 21 has 72.85 square miles of land area and has no water area. As of 2010-2014, the total Hartsburg-Emden Community Unit School District 21 population is 1,063. Hartsburg-Emden Community Unit School District 21 median household income is $50,859 in 2010-2014. Hartsburg-Emden Community Unit School District 21 median house value is $96,100 in 2010-2014. On average, Hartsburg-Emden Community Unit School District 21 is better than the state average in quality.
| Hot Rankings |
Hartsburg-Emden Community Unit School District 21 Map, Border, and Nearby Locations
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | |
Total Students: | 218 | 236 | 222 | 228 | 237 | 241 | 239 |
English Language Learner Students: | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Teachers: | 24.00 | NA | 25.56 | 24.57 | 26.00 | 25.50 | 24.00 |
Prekindergarten: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Kindergarten: | NA | NA | 2.00 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
Elementary: | 6.00 | NA | 11.56 | 12.65 | 11.00 | 11.50 | 10.00 |
Secondary: | 18.00 | NA | 12.00 | 11.92 | 13.00 | 12.00 | 12.00 |
Ungraded: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA |
Total Other Staff: | 12.00 | 15.14 | 3.00 | 3.51 | 3.40 | 4.40 | 6.40 |
Instructional Aides: | NA | 1.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Instructional Coordinators & Supervisors: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Total Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.42 | 1.40 | 1.40 | 0.00 |
Elementary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Secondary Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 1.40 | 0.00 |
Other Guidance Counselors: | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.02 | 1.00 | NA | NA |
Librarians/Media Specialists: | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Library/Media Support: | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
District Administrators: | 0.50 | NA | 1.00 | 1.09 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
District Administrative Support: | NA | 0.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
School Administrators: | 1.00 | NA | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
School Administrative Support: | NA | 3.00 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.00 |
Student Support Services: | NA | NA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | NA | 0.00 |
Other Support Services: | 10.50 | 10.14 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 3.40 |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 9.08 | NA | 8.69 | 9.28 | 9.12 | 9.45 | 9.96 |
Schools
Emden Elementary School | Kindergarten to Grade 4 | 309 Market St, Emden IL 62635 | |
Hartsburg-Emden Jr-Sr High School | Grade 5 to Grade 12 | 400 West Front St, Hartsburg IL 62643 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | State Average |
ISAT Test | |||||
2003 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 75.7% |
2004 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80.8% | 79.1% |
2005 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 79.3% |
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86.4% | 85.6% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 86.7% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 85.1% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 85.2% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100% | 86.4% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 94.5% | 87.3% |
2012 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 87.7% |
2013 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 25.0% | 54.8% |
2003 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 45.5% | 62.0% |
2004 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 53.8% | 65.1% |
2005 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 61.6% | 66.6% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 54.5% | 70.7% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 66.6% | 72.9% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 71.8% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84.2% | 72.2% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 83.4% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 61.5% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 58.4% | 58.8% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 100% | 84.8% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 86.4% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 84.6% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 73.3% | 85.8% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 85.9% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 87.7% |
2012 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 94.4% | 88.1% |
2013 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 14.3% | 60.2% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 80% | 72.9% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 79.0% | 73.7% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 76.2% | 73.2% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 53.4% | 73.8% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 82.4% | 73.7% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 74.7% |
2012 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 72.2% | 76.0% |
2013 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 21.4% | 59.2% |
2003 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 81.8% | 66.5% |
2004 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 17.6% | 67.8% |
2005 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 84% | 71.4% |
2006 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 80% | 79.9% |
2007 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 84.2% | 79.7% |
2008 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 80.9% | 76.2% |
2009 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 60% | 76.8% |
2010 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 76.6% |
2011 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 79.4% |
2012 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 79.8% |
2013 | Science | 4th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 80.9% |
2003 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 68.3% |
2004 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 71.8% |
2005 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 80% | 73.2% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 100% | 78.6% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 82.5% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 94.7% | 81.3% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 85% | 82.5% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 71.4% | 83.4% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 93.8% | 84.0% |
2012 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 83.6% |
2013 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 42.1% | 59.4% |
2003 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 66.6% | 60.4% |
2004 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 75.0% | 60.9% |
2005 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 65% | 62.7% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 68.5% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 78.6% | 69.7% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 89.4% | 73.6% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 78.5% | 74.7% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 87.5% | 76.4% |
2012 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 92.3% | 77.8% |
2013 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 57.9% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 88.2% | 79.1% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 96% | 81.4% |
2008 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 100.0% | 82.7% |
2009 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 80% | 82.4% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 77.2% | 84.6% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 75.1% | 83.9% |
2012 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 84.9% |
2013 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 59.6% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 58.9% | 72.8% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 96% | 73.4% |
2008 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 79.1% |
2009 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 90% | 79.9% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 95.5% | 81.2% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 84.1% |
2012 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 94.1% | 81.7% |
2013 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 28.5% | 58.9% |
2006 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 87.0% | 76.0% |
2007 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 76.2% | 79.4% |
2008 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 80.4% |
2009 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 82.7% |
2010 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 84.4% |
2011 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 84.3% |
2012 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 84.6% |
2013 | Math | 7th Grade | % met std | 58.8% | 59.1% |
2006 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 60.8% | 72% |
2007 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 38.1% | 73.3% |
2008 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 71.0% | 77.7% |
2009 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 61.6% | 77.5% |
2010 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 83.4% | 77.4% |
2011 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 63.6% | 78.8% |
2012 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 60% | 78.1% |
2013 | Reading | 7th Grade | % met std | 70.6% | 58.5% |
2003 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 83.8% | 73.7% |
2004 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 65.2% | 74.4% |
2005 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 74.6% |
2006 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 91.3% | 80.9% |
2007 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 57.2% | 79.3% |
2008 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 79.2% |
2009 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 77.0% | 79.5% |
2010 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 82.4% |
2011 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 95.5% | 81.9% |
2012 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 79.9% |
2013 | Science | 7th Grade | % met std | 88.3% | 79.0% |
2003 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 76% | 53.1% |
2004 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 57.2% | 54.4% |
2005 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 52.4% | 54.3% |
2006 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 95% | 78.2% |
2007 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 90.4% | 81.3% |
2008 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 73.7% | 80.3% |
2009 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 81.7% |
2010 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 83.7% |
2011 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 79.0% | 86.3% |
2012 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 95.5% | 85.0% |
2013 | Math | 8th Grade | % met std | 40.0% | 58.9% |
2003 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 76% | 63.7% |
2004 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 65.5% | 67.1% |
2005 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 71.5% | 72.8% |
2006 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 85% | 79.2% |
2007 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 81.7% |
2008 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 50% | 81.4% |
2009 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 83.6% |
2010 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 80.0% | 84.1% |
2011 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 89.5% | 85.0% |
2012 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 77.3% | 86.2% |
2013 | Reading | 8th Grade | % met std | 33.3% | 59.8% |
PSAE Test | |||||
2003 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 57.9% | 53.3% |
2004 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 70.6% | 53.1% |
2005 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 52.8% |
2006 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 79.2% | 53.7% |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 70.6% | 52.7% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 50.1% | 53.0% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 36.4% | 51.6% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 59.1% | 52.7% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 42.1% | 51.3% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 35.5% | 51.6% |
2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 20.0% | 51.8% |
2003 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 63.1% | 56.4% |
2004 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 53.0% | 56.8% |
2005 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 59.5% |
2006 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 70.8% | 58.4% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 64.7% | 54.0% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 56.3% | 53.3% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 27.3% | 56.9% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 68.1% | 54.0% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 42.1% | 51.1% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 42.0% | 50.6% |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 40.0% | 54.8% |
2003 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 52.6% | 51.3% |
2004 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 76.5% | 52.9% |
2005 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 50.0% | 52.5% |
2006 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 54.2% | 50.8% |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 52.9% | 51.0% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 43.8% | 51.2% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 19% | 50.5% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 54.5% | 52.4% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 26.3% | 49.2% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 45.2% | 51.7% |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 26.7% | 49.4% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
School District Fiscal Information
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | Amount | Per Student | % | |
Total Revenue: | $3,267,000 | $14,716 | $3,268,000 | $14,333 | $2,964,000 | $12,506 | |||
Federal: | $128,000 | $577 | 3.9% | $290,000 | $1,272 | 8.9% | $331,000 | $1,397 | 11.2% |
State: | $1,073,000 | $4,833 | 32.8% | $1,229,000 | $5,390 | 37.6% | $1,130,000 | $4,768 | 38.1% |
Local: | $2,066,000 | $9,306 | 63.2% | $1,749,000 | $7,671 | 53.5% | $1,503,000 | $6,342 | 50.7% |
Total Expenditures: | $3,305,000 | $14,887 | $3,237,000 | $14,197 | $3,106,000 | $13,105 | |||
Total Current Expenditures: | $3,089,000 | $13,914 | $3,044,000 | $13,351 | $2,915,000 | $12,300 | |||
Instructional Expenditures: | $1,789,000 | $8,059 | 57.9% | $1,715,000 | $7,522 | 56.3% | $1,696,000 | $7,156 | 58.2% |
Student and Staff Support: | $167,000 | $752 | 5.4% | $211,000 | $925 | 6.9% | $163,000 | $688 | 5.6% |
Administration: | $466,000 | $2,099 | 15.1% | $496,000 | $2,175 | 16.3% | $455,000 | $1,920 | 15.6% |
Operations, Food, Other: | $667,000 | $3,005 | 21.6% | $622,000 | $2,728 | 20.4% | $601,000 | $2,536 | 20.6% |
Total Capital Outlay: | $55,000 | $248 | $29,000 | $127 | $21,000 | $89 | |||
Construction: | $0 | $0 | $3,000 | $13 | $0 | $0 | |||
Total Other: | $2,000 | $9 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Interest on Debt: | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |||
Total Salary: | $1,811,000 | $8,158 | $1,781,000 | $7,811 | $1,805,000 | $7,616 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Salary: | $1,152,000 | $5,189 | 63.6% | $1,128,000 | $4,947 | 63.3% | $1,114,000 | $4,700 | 61.7% |
Other Salary: | $659,000 | $2,968 | 36.4% | $653,000 | $2,864 | 36.7% | $691,000 | $2,916 | 38.3% |
Total Benefit: | $774,000 | $3,486 | $735,000 | $3,224 | $715,000 | $3,017 | |||
Instruction/Teacher Benefit: | $509,000 | $2,293 | 65.8% | $480,000 | $2,105 | 65.3% | $485,000 | $2,046 | 67.8% |
Other Benefit: | $265,000 | $1,194 | 34.2% | $255,000 | $1,118 | 34.7% | $230,000 | $970 | 32.2% |
* Hartsburg-Emden Community Unit School District 21 was rated 3.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.